<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Criminal Defense Attorney 411 Directory &#187; Little</title>
	<atom:link href="http://criminalattorney411directory.com/tag/little/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://criminalattorney411directory.com</link>
	<description>Find Great Defense Attorney Info</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:32:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Daubert Having Little Effect on Expert Witness Consulting</title>
		<link>http://criminalattorney411directory.com/2009/11/20/daubert-having-little-effect-on-expert-witness-consulting.html</link>
		<comments>http://criminalattorney411directory.com/2009/11/20/daubert-having-little-effect-on-expert-witness-consulting.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CriminalDefense</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[White Collar Criminal Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consulting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daubert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Expert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Having]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Little]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Witness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://criminalattorney411directory.com/2009/11/20/daubert-having-little-effect-on-expert-witness-consulting.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


In Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), the Supreme Court overhauled the standards for admitting expert witness testimony in federal court by removing &#8220;junk science&#8221; from the courtroom and introducing a new reliability test for the permissibility of expert theory and technique. 
It would seem the consequence of the ruling would [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://criminalattorney411directory.com/2009/11/20/daubert-having-little-effect-on-expert-witness-consulting.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
