Posts Tagged ‘Insanity’

Product Description
This digital document is an article from Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, published by Northwestern University, School of Law on September 22, 1996. The length of the article is 6504 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

From the supplier: The competence of criminal clients to join their attorneys in making decisions about their cases is important whether or not these come to trial. Research indicates that attorneys’ paternalism explains much of their trial behavior and decisions about client competence. The findings of a study at the Center for Forensic Psychiatry suggest that competence in criminal trials should be more carefully evaluated and that some solution such as surrogate decisionmaking should be found for defendants who cannot stand trial.

Citation Details
Title: Decision-making in criminal defense: an empirical study of insanity pleas and the impact of doubted client competence.
Author: Richard J. Bonnie
Publication: Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (Refereed)
Date: September 22, 1996
Publisher: Northwestern University, School of Law
Volume: 87 Issue: n1 Page: 48-62

Distributed by Thomson Gale

Decision-making in criminal defense: an empirical study of insanity pleas and the impact of doubted client competence.: An article from: Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology

Powered by Yahoo! Answers